After nine seasons with the Carolina Hurricanes, Pesce looks set to find a new home.
Player Overview
Originally selected by Carolina in the third round of the 2013 NHL Draft, Brett Pesce has spent his entire career with the Hurricanes to this point.
The defenseman has been a pillar within the team’s top-four group, and while he won’t put up huge offensive numbers, Pesce’s impact in his own end has remained fairly consistent. He’s good in battles, effective in being able break up plays to kill offense, and has some physicality in his game.
The defenseman also has a hard slap shot and can move down to get into position to take a pass. He doesn’t have a ton of speed and isn’t necessarily much of a playmaker, but he’s comfortable enough handling the puck in all zones.
That said, Pesce is coming off a bit of a down year, which could have dropped his value to an extent. His 13 assists in 70 games this season was the lowest mark of his entire career, while his usage also dropped down to only a little over 20 minutes per game, after four straight years of being around the 22-minute mark.
Still, Pesce remains a good option to provide some defensive stability for the right price.
What We Know
- The Hurricanes reportedly wanted to re-sign Pesce to a deal carrying around a $4M or $5M cap hit last summer, according to The Fourth Period’s David Pagnotta.
- However, Pagnotta’s recent report indicates that Pesce is likely to head to free agency on July 1.
- On 32 Thoughts, Elliotte Friedman noted the New Jersey Devils could be one of the teams in on Pesce.
- Pagnotta also noted that the defenseman is on Nashville’s radar.
Comparables
Below, we take a look at what Pesce’s deal could look like at different lengths. With Pesce turning 30 years old in November, the comparables used will generally be defensemen who were between 28 and 32 years old in the first year of their deal.
For readers using mobile view, the tables below allow for horizontal scrolling.
7/8 YEARS
Carolina would be the only team able to sign Pesce to an eight-year contract, and comparables for eight-year deals are below.
| Player | Age | First Year of Contract | Signing Year P/82 | Career P/82 | TOI Season | Career TOI | Contract | On $88M Cap |
| Brett Pesce | 30 | 2024 | 15 70GP | 26 627GP | 20:17 | 21:05 | ||
| *Oliver Ekman-Larsson | 28 | 2019 | 42 82GP | 41 576GP | 23:41 | 23:39 | $8.25M 8 years | $8.91M 8 years |
| John Carlson | 28 | 2018 | 68 82GP | 45 608GP | 24:47 | 23:00 | $8.00M 8 years | $8.86M 8 years |
| *Brent Seabrook | 31 | 2016 | 31 82GP | 34 763GP | 22:11 | 22:29 | $6.88M 8 years | $8.29M 8 years |
| **Morgan Rielly | 28 | 2022 | 51 63GP | 44 580GP | 23:43 | 21:53 | $7.50M 8 years | $8.00M 8 years |
| *Marc-Edouard Vlasic | 31 | 2018 | 31 75GP | 26 812GP | 21:14 | 22:01 | $7.00M 8 years | $7.75M 8 years |
| **Noah Hanifin | 27 | 2024 | 47 77GP | 34 675GP | 23:37 | 20:29 | $7.35M 8 years | $7.35M 8 years |
| Filip Hronek | 27 | 2024 | 49 81GP | 43 390GP | 23:26 | 22:32 | $7.25M 8 years | $7.25M 8 years |
| *Colton Parayko | 29 | 2022 | 31 32GP | 34 418GP | 21:20 | 21:43 | $6.50M 8 years | $6.93M 8 years |
| **Hampus Lindholm | 28 | 2022 | 30 61GP | 31 589GP | 22:32 | 22:11 | $6.50M 8 years | $6.93M 8 years |
| *Ryan Ellis | 28 | 2019 | 60 44GP | 36 396GP | 23:31 | 19:36 | $6.25M 8 years | $6.75M 8 years |
| *MacKenzie Weeger | 29 | 2023 | 45 80GP | 32 306GP | 23:22 | 19:33 | $6.25M 8 years | $6.59M 8 years |
| Damon Severson | 29 | 2023 | 33 81GP | 33 647GP | 19:57 | 21:11 | $6.25M 8 years | $6.59M 8 years |
| *Ryan Pulock | 28 | 2022 | 25 56GP | 35 290GP | 22:27 | 21:03 | $6.15M 8 years | $6.56M 8 years |
| Adam Pelech | 27 | 2021 | 21 56GP | 20 303GP | 21:03 | 19:16 | $5.75M 8 years | $6.21M 8 years |
| **Gustav Forsling | 28 | 2024 | 42 63GP | 33 397GP | 21:48 | 20:27 | $5.75M 8 years | $5.75M 8 years |
| *Erik Cernak | 26 | 2023 | 19 55GP | 21 226GP | 19:09 | 19:15 | $5.20M 8 years | $5.48M 8 years |
**Deal signed mid-season – Points/82 pace prior to signing are used for signing year stats.
Just looking at the comps though, there’s really nothing pointing to the fact that Pesce could earn that kind of term.
The only comps above that Pesce would realistically be comparable to would be Adam Pelech and Erik Cernak, at the bottom of the table. The production and ice time were similar to those of Pelech, while Pesce even had better numbers than Cernak.
At the same time, there are two things working against Pesce there. First, both defenders are quite a ways younger than Pesce, leaving much more risk of decline in Pesce’s deal. Then additionally, Pelech was coming off back-to-back Eastern Conference Final appearances where he had established himself as one of the best shutdown defenders in the NHL, while Cernak was coming off back-to-back Stanley Cups. As a result, Pesce, isn’t overly likely to reach the adjusted cap hit of either player, and any unlikely maximum-term deal would likely fall well short of a $5M cap hit.
Seven years would also be an unlikely contract term for Pesce, but would be the maximum he could get as of July 1, with comps below.
| Player | Age | First Year of Contract | Signing Year P/82 | Career P/82 | TOI Season | Career TOI | Contract | On $88M Cap |
| Brett Pesce | 30 | 2024 | 15 70GP | 26 627GP | 20:17 | 21:05 | ||
| Dougie Hamilton | 28 | 2021 | 63 55GP | 46 607GP | 22:43 | 20:27 | $9.00M 7 years | $9.71M 7 years |
| Alex Pietrangelo | 30 | 2020 | 61 70GP | 49 758GP | 24:11 | 24:38 | $8.80M 7 years | $9.50M 7 years |
| *Jared Spurgeon | 31 | 2020 | 43 82GP | 35 591GP | 24:09 | 22:21 | $7.58M 7 years | $8.18M 7 years |
| Keith Yandle | 30 | 2016 | 47 82GP | 46 661GP | 19:58 | 21:10 | $6.35M 7 years | $7.65M 7 years |
| ***Johnny Boychuk | 31 | 2015 | 44 59GP | 23 380GP | 21:38 | 20:22 | $6.00M 7 years | $7.39M 7 years |
| *Ryan McDonagh | 30 | 2019 | 38 63GP | 37 530GP | 23:20 | 23:30 | $6.75M 7 years | $7.29M 7 years |
| **Devon Toews | 30 | 2024 | 52 81GP | 48 315GP | 25:06 | 23:01 | $7.25M 7 years | $7.25M 7 years |
| *Justin Faulk | 28 | 2019 | 35 82GP | 38 559GP | 22:25 | 23:16 | $6.50M 7 years | $7.02M 7 years |
| Torey Krug | 29 | 2020 | 66 61GP | 66 61GP | 20:29 | 20:19 | $6.50M 7 years | $7.02M 7 years |
| *Jonas Brodin | 28 | 2021 | 33 69GP | 22 555GP | 21:33 | 21:50 | $6.00M 7 years | $6.48M 7 years |
| Scott Mayfield | 31 | 2023 | 24 82GP | 21 428GP | 21:01 | 19:12 | $3.50M 7 ears | $3.69M 7 years |
**Deal signed early into season – stats from that year before signing, as well as previous year are combined for Signing Year stats
***Deal signed mid-season – stats from season before signing used for signing year stats
Even with the players who signed seven-year deals around the same age though, you see very few realistic comps. The only one that really stands out is Scott Mayfield. The production and ice time were relatively similar, and while Pesce may be a bit higher than a $3.7M cap hit, the Mayfield comp is by far the best comp of the ones listed.
6 YEARS
For a six-year contract, we don’t have a ton to work with in the way of comps, given it hasn’t been a popular length of deal for defenders around Pesce’s age.
| Player | Age | First Year of Contract | Signing Year P/82 | Career P/82 | TOI Season | Career TOI | Contract | On $88M Cap |
| Brett Pesce | 30 | 2024 | 15 70GP | 26 627GP | 20:17 | 21:05 | ||
| **Nate Schmidt | 28 | 2019 | 39 84GP | 24 284GP | 22:14 | 18:08 | $5.95M 6 years | $6.42M 6 years |
| Ryan Graves | 28 | 2023 | 27 78GP | 27 302GP | 19:57 | 18:59 | $4.50M 6 years | $4.74M 6 years |
Of the two comps, Pesce’s numbers are certainly more closely aligned to those of Ryan Graves. The two defensemen had similar signing year ice time, as well as career production. The while Pesce had the higher career ice time, Graves had the higher signing year production. Graves did sign at two years younger, but Pesce had the higher career experience.
As a result, Graves’ $4.75M adjusted cap hit is the best comp we have available for a possible six-year deal for Pesce.
5 YEARS
At five years, we start to see what’s a more realistic length for Pesce’s deal.
| Player | Age | First Year of Contract | Signing Year P/82 | Career P/82 | TOI Season | Career TOI | Contract | On $88M Cap |
| Brett Pesce | 30 | 2024 | 15 70GP | 26 627GP | 20:17 | 21:05 | ||
| *Dustin Byfuglien | 31 | 2016 | 50 52GP | 48 649GP | 24:14 | 20:53 | $7.60M 5 years | $9.16M 5 years |
| Alex Goligoski | 31 | 2016 | 37 82GP | 40 562GP | 23:50 | 22:37 | $5.45M 5 years | $6.57M 5 years |
| Tyler Myers | 29 | 2019 | 32 80GP | 34 635GP | 20:21 | 22:22 | $6.00M 5 years | $6.48M 5 years |
| *Rasmus Ristolainen | 28 | 2022 | 23 50GP | 36 592GP | 21:26 | 23:37 | $5.10M 5 years | $5.44M 5 years |
| Karl Alzner | 29 | 2017 | 13 82GP | 16 591GP | 19:47 | 20:12 | $4.63M 5 years | $5.43M 5 years |
| Jason Demers | 28 | 2016 | 30 62GP | 28 423GP | 20:52 | 18:44 | $4.50M 5 years | $5.42M 5 years |
| Jamie Oleksiak | 29 | 2021 | 21 56GP | 16 369GP | 20:29 | 16:09 | $4.60M 5 years | $4.97M 5 years |
While Pesce doesn’t compare well against any of the comps from Tyler Myers or above, we do see more similar stats with some of the defenseman lower on the table.
In the set of three comps all right around a $5.4M adjusted cap hit, Pesce had better numbers than Karl Alzner in every single category. Then with Jason Demers, the career production and signing year ice time were fairly comparable, and while Demers had much better signing year production, Pesce had much higher career usage. Pesce doesn’t compare nearly as well to Rasmus Ristolainen, leaving a bit of doubt he’d be up around that $5.4M mark, but he does compare better against Jamie Oleksiak’s numbers. Pesce had the lower signing year production, but signing year ice time was comparable, and Pesce’s career numbers were much better, pointing to the fact that he’d likely be a little above the $5M mark.
4 YEARS
A four-year contract would be another realistic term for Pesce’s deal.
| Player | Age | First Year of Contract | Signing Year P/82 | Career P/82 | TOI Season | Career TOI | Contract | On $88M Cap |
| Brett Pesce | 30 | 2024 | 15 70GP | 26 627GP | 20:17 | 21:05 | ||
| Kevin Shattenkirk | 28 | 2017 | 57 80GP | 50 480GP | 19:56 | 21:06 | $6.65M 4 years | $7.80M 4 years |
| *Mattias Ekholm | 32 | 2022 | 39 48GP | 31 586GP | 22:52 | 21:36 | $6.25M 4 years | $6.67M 4 years |
| *Jared Spurgeon | 27 | 2016 | 44 32GP | 30 307GP | 22:18 | 21:01 | $5.19M 4 years | $6.26M 4 years |
| *Jake Muzzin | 31 | 2020 | 35 52GP | 36 578GP | 21:36 | 21:15 | $5.63M 4 years | $6.08M 4 years |
| T.J. Brodie | 30 | 2021 | 24 64GP | 34 634GP | 20:27 | 22:35 | $5.00M 4 years | $5.40M 4 years |
| Brendan Smith | 28 | 2017 | 14 51GP | 19 309GP | 19:15 | 18:01 | $4.35M 4 years | $5.10M 4 years |
| Ben Chiarot | 31 | 2022 | 29 76GP | 20 489GP | 22:51 | 18:38 | $4.75M 4 years | $5.07M 4 years |
| Chris Tanev | 31 | 2020 | 24 69GP | 19 514GP | 19:32 | 19:44 | $4.50M 4 years | $4.86M 4 years |
| Josh Manson | 31 | 2022 | 20 67GP | 21 475GP | 18:59 | 19:44 | $4.50M 4 years | $4.80M 4 years |
| *Artem Zub | 28 | 2023 | 22 95GP | 23 142GP | 21:11 | 20:15 | $4.50M 4 years | $4.74M 4 years |
| Kris Russell | 30 | 2017 | 16 67GP | 24 641GP | 20:17 | 19:24 | $4.00M 4 years | $4.69M 4 years |
| Connor Murphy | 29 | 2022 | 25 50GP | 18 494GP | 22:09 | 19:06 | $4.40M 4 years | $4.69M 4 years |
| Jake Gardiner | 29 | 2019 | 40 62GP | 36 551GP | 21:13 | 21:21 | $4.05M 4 years | $4.37M 4 years |
| Adam Larsson | 29 | 2021 | 15 56GP | 19 603GP | 19:39 | 20:42 | $4.00M 4 years | $4.32M 4 years |
| **Jake McCabe | 28 | 2021 | 17 79GP | 18 353GP | 18:38 | 19:15 | $4.00M 4 years | $4.32M 4 years |
| Nick Leddy | 31 | 2022 | 26 75GP | 35 851GP | 21:25 | 20:37 | $4.00M 4 years | $4.27M 4 years |
| Brenden Dillon | 30 | 2020 | 17 69GP | 16 598GP | 19:27 | 18:34 | $3.90M 4 years | $4.21M 4 years |
**Limited games played in signing year – stats used from year before signing + prior year for signing year stats
Right off the bat though, Pesce’s numbers are lower than every defender from T.J. Brodie and above, so we know we’re looking at comps from Brendan Smith ($5.1M adjusted cap hit) and below. At the same time, Pesce’s numbers are also generally better than any of Dillon, McCabe and Larsson on the low end of the comps (aside from two offensive defensemen in Gardiner and Leddy). As a result, we’re likely also looking in the range of Connor Murphy’s $4.7M adjusted cap hit and above on the low end of comps.
Looking at how Pesce compares to Smith at the top of that range though, and the comparison points to the fact that Pesce should be well above the $5.1M adjusted cap hit, with better numbers in every category. That said, with all six other comps from Chiarot down to Murphy, he generally had better career numbers, but his signing year production was lower than all, and his signing year ice time was lower than some.
Pesce’s career ice time gives him the edge over Russell, and Zub’s lack of career experience likely points to Pesce being higher than him. Meanwhile, Pesce’s usage likely puts him above the Tanev and Manson contracts. That said, both Chiarot and Murphy act as more interesting comps, where each of the defensemen had a much better signing year than Pesce.
So while Pesce’s value may be right around the $5M mark on a four-year deal, it wouldn’t be a whole lot higher.
1-3 YEARS
Any deal between one and three years is very unlikely for Pesce. Given his age, he’ll want term on his contract, and probably won’t be in a better position by re-entering the market in the near future after any short-term deal.
| Player | Age | First Year of Contract | Signing Year P/82 | Career P/82 | TOI Season | Career TOI | Contract | On $88M Cap |
| Brett Pesce | 30 | 2024 | 15 70GP | 26 627GP | 20:17 | 21:05 | ||
| Mike Green | 30 | 2015 | 51 72GP | 51 575GP | 19:06 | 22:11 | $6.00M 3 years | $7.39M 3 years |
| Justin Schultz | 27 | 2017 | 54 78GP | 38 344GP | 20:27 | 21:21 | $5.50M 3 years | $6.45M 3 years |
| Tyson Barrie | 30 | 2021 | 70 56GP | 53 610GP | 21:24 | 21:45 | $4.50M 3 years | $4.88M 3 years |
In terms of three-year comps above, we don’t have much to go off. The three recent examples are all offensive defensemen, that don’t really provide an equivalent value for Pesce. Based on the market value for Pesce on a four-year deal though as explored above, any three-year deal would likely come with a similar cap hit.
However, as I’ve talked about in other projection articles, the one possibility that’s become a little more popular is a two-year deal. We’ve seen both Dmitry Orlov and Vladislav Gavrikov take deals at an inflated cap hit, that would be higher than they could otherwise get at a different term.
| Player | Age | First Year of Contract | Signing Year P/82 | Career P/82 | TOI Season | Career TOI | Contract | On $88M Cap |
| Brett Pesce | 30 | 2024 | 15 70GP | 26 627GP | 20:17 | 21:05 | ||
| Dmitry Orlov | 32 | 2023 | 45 66GP | 32 709GP | 22:33 | 20:15 | $7.75M 2 years | $8.17M 2 years |
| Vladislav Gavrikov | 28 | 2023 | 22 72GP | 24 276GP | 21:58 | 20:48 | $5.88M 2 years | $6.20M 2 years |
While the Orlov comp isn’t overly realistic, Pesce’s career numbers align quite closely to Gavrikov’s stats. While Pesce had signing year production and ice time that was quite a bit lower than Gavrikov, meaning he’d be unlikely to reach Gavrikov’s $6.2M adjusted cap hit, a two-year deal could still see a cap hit that’s higher than it would otherwise be at a longer length of deal, likely between the $5.5M and $6M mark.
Coming off a down year, there’s always the chance we could see Pesce take a one-year deal, in an attempt to build up his value. Still, given his age, it would be a risk and remains unlikely.
| Player | Age | First Year of Contract | Signing Year P/82 | Career P/82 | TOI Season | Career TOI | Contract | On $88M Cap |
| Brett Pesce | 30 | 2024 | 15 70GP | 26 627GP | 20:17 | 21:05 | ||
| John Klingberg | 30 | 2022 | 52 74GP | 56 552GP | 22:13 | 22:59 | $7.00M 1 year | $7.47M 1 year |
| Matt Dumba | 30 | 2023 | 15 79GP | 32 598GP | 21:17 | 20:37 | $3.90M 1 year | $4.11M 1 year |
| Tyson Barrie | 29 | 2020 | 46 70GP | 51 554GP | 21:53 | 21:47 | $3.75M 1 year | $4.05M 1 year |
Looking at the comps though, by far the most comparable player would be Matt Dumba, at a $4.1M cap hit. While it’s on the low side, and any small chance of a one-year deal for Pesce would likely need to be closer to market value, the Dumba comp is the best comparable of the few we have.
Projection
A deal between four and six years remains the most likely scenario for Pesce’s contract, at varying cap hits depending on the term.
| Term | Projected Cap hit | Maximum Cap Hit | Minimum Cap Hit |
| 6 Years | $4.75M | $5.00M | $4.00M |
| 5 Years | $5.30M | $5.50M | $4.75M |
| 4 Years | $5.13M | $5.25M | $4.75M |
There’s also an outside chance that Pesce could get a maximum-term deal at a reduced cap hit (like Mayfield), but it remains very unlikely.
| Term | Projected Cap hit | Maximum Cap Hit | Minimum Cap Hit |
| 7/8 Years | $4.25M | $4.50M | $3.50M |
A deal at three years or less is also extremely unlikely for Pesce. Of the options, a two-year deal at an inflated cap hit is the most possible, but remains a longshot.
| Term | Projected Cap hit | Maximum Cap Hit | Minimum Cap Hit |
| 1 Years | $5.00M | $5.00M | $4.00M |
| 2 Years | $5.75M | $6.00M | $5.50M |
| 3 Years | $5.25M | $5.50M | $4.50M |
Leave a comment